Type A vs Type B Personality: The Self-Talk Difference

What a Type B personality is, how it differs from Type A, why the evidence for the split is weak, and how to reframe never-enough Type A self-talk.

Two people at a sunlit cafe table: a man writing in a planner and a woman laughing with a cappuccino in her hand.
Key takeaways
  • Type A describes someone competitive, impatient and driven; Type B describes someone more relaxed and patient
  • The idea came from two cardiologists in the 1950s who linked Type A to heart disease
  • Later meta-analyses found little or no link between Type A and heart disease; hostility showed only a small one
  • The A/B split is weak science, but the self-talk difference, “never enough” versus “good enough”, is real and changeable
  • Type A self-talk can be reframed with CBT without giving up ambition
Part of: Self-Talk

Turn this into a daily habit — free to start in the MindLift app:

A Type B personality is relaxed, patient and steady; Type A is competitive, impatient and driven. The split dates from 1950s heart research and has weak scientific support. But the self-talk difference behind it, “never enough” versus “good enough”, is real, and it can be reframed.

What is the difference between Type A and Type B?

Type A describes a pattern of competitiveness, impatience, time urgency and quick irritation. Type B describes the opposite: a calmer pace, more patience and less need to win every exchange. Neither is a clinical diagnosis, and most people are a mix of both.

How Type A and Type B are usually described

Type A

  • Always racing the clock
  • Competitive, even in small things
  • Impatient with delays and other people
  • Struggles to rest without guilt

Type B

  • Works at a steady pace
  • Less driven to compare and win
  • Patient with delays
  • Can rest without earning it first
The classic Type A and Type B descriptions. Most people sit somewhere between the two, and shift with stress.

Where did Type A and Type B come from?

The labels came from cardiology, not psychology. In 1959, cardiologists Meyer Friedman and Ray Rosenman reported that men with a hurried, competitive behaviour pattern had higher cholesterol and more heart disease than calmer men[1]. They called the hurried pattern Type A and the calmer one Type B.

Why the evidence is weak

The early results did not hold up well. A meta-analysis of prospective studies by Michael Myrtek found essentially no link between Type A and coronary heart disease, and only a very small one for hostility, the angry, cynical part of the pattern[2].

There is also a funding problem. Analysing internal industry documents, Mark Petticrew and colleagues showed that the tobacco industry was a major funder of Type A research, partly to point attention away from smoking. They argue this helps explain why early promising results faded in later studies[3].

So “I am Type A” is a casual description, not a scientific category. That does not make the experience behind it imaginary.

The self-talk difference that does matter

What people usually mean by Type A is a particular inner voice. It says the work is never finished, rest has to be earned and anyone slower is in the way. The Type B voice says the work is good enough for now and tomorrow is another day.

That “never enough” voice overlaps with perfectionism, which is a much better-studied trait. A meta-analysis by Thomas Curran and Andrew Hill found that perfectionism among college students rose between 1989 and 2016, especially the sense that other people expect perfection from you[4]. If the Type A description fits you, the perfectionist type quiz will tell you more than the A/B label does.

The good news: self-talk is not a fixed trait. CBT, one of the best-studied approaches for anxiety and stress, works by catching specific thoughts and testing them against the evidence[5]. You can keep the drive and drop the voice that says it is never enough.

4 Type A thoughts, reframed

These are the lines most people with a Type A pattern recognise. Each reframe keeps the ambition and drops the distortion.

1. “If I stop, I fall behind.”

Reframe: “Rest is part of the work. I will get more done tomorrow if I stop at a reasonable hour tonight.”

2. “It is not good enough yet.”

Reframe: “It meets the brief. Extra polish now costs more than it adds; I can ship it and improve it later.”

3. “Everyone else is too slow.”

Reframe: “People work at different speeds. My irritation tells me I am stressed, not that they are failing.”

4. “Relaxing is lazy.”

Reframe: “Relaxing is how my body and mind recover. Lazy is a judgement, not a description of an evening off.”

If your Type A side shows up mostly under pressure, the stress response pattern quiz shows how your body and thoughts react when stress spikes. And if you like typologies, our guide to the 16 personality types and their inner critic does the same thing for every MBTI type.

Hostility: the one part worth watching

If any piece of the Type A pattern deserves attention, it is hostility: cynical, angry, suspicious reactions to other people. In the research that weakened the Type A idea, hostility was the part that kept a small link with heart disease. It is also the part that tends to show up in self-talk as “everyone is incompetent” or “nobody pulls their weight”.

Hostile thoughts often hide stress. When you notice a flash of contempt at a slow driver or a late colleague, try asking what you were already worried about before it happened. The irritation is usually pointing at your own overload.

Is it Type A, or is it anxiety?

Sometimes what feels like a driven personality is actually anxiety doing the driving. The difference is in how it feels from the inside. Drive feels like pull toward something you want. Anxiety feels like push away from something you fear: failure, judgement, falling behind. If your hurry comes with a knot in your stomach, racing thoughts at night or dread on Sunday evenings, it is worth treating as stress, not as personality. That is good news, because stress and anxious self-talk respond well to practice.

What Type A can borrow from Type B

You do not need to become someone else. Borrow three Type B habits and test them for a week:

  1. Define done before you start. Write what “good enough” looks like, then stop when you reach it.
  2. Notice the rush. When you feel the urge to hurry, ask whether the deadline is real or self-made.
  3. Rest first, then judge. Take the break, then decide whether the work needs more. It usually needs less than the tired voice says.

Turn “never enough” into “good enough”

The Type A voice is fastest when you are tired and behind. That is the moment to have a better sentence ready. Write down the thought. MindLift names the pattern behind it and gives you a more balanced way to see it, in about 60 seconds, in one of three tones (Realist, Growth or Compassionate). Save the ones that land to your Favorites.

Quiet the never-enough voice with MindLift. Free to start, on iOS 15+, Android 8+ and the web.

Download MindLift for iOS and Android

Type A and Type B are informal descriptions, not diagnoses. MindLift is a self-help tool and not a substitute for professional care. If stress is affecting your health, sleep or daily life, consider talking to a doctor or licensed mental health professional.

Common questions

Frequently asked questions

What is a Type B personality?

A Type B personality describes someone who is relatively relaxed, patient and easygoing, who works steadily without a constant sense of urgency. It was defined in the 1950s as the opposite of Type A, the competitive, impatient and time-pressured pattern.

What is the difference between Type A and Type B?

Type A is described as competitive, impatient, achievement-driven and quick to irritation. Type B is described as calmer, more patient and less driven by time pressure. Most people are a mix and shift between the two depending on stress and setting.

Is Type A personality real?

As a description of behaviour, yes: some people are reliably more hurried and competitive. As a personality type with a proven health effect, the evidence is weak. Prospective meta-analyses found little or no link between Type A and heart disease.

Can a Type A person become Type B?

You do not need to change type to feel calmer. The part that hurts most is usually the self-talk: “I am behind”, “it is never enough”. That inner voice can be reframed with CBT while you keep the drive that serves you.

Are Type B people less successful?

There is no good evidence for that. Type B describes pace and pressure, not ability. Patience, steady effort and recovering well from setbacks are all useful at work.

Like what you're reading?

Accelerate your growth journey

Reframe the patterns that hold you back — and watch your Top Pattern change over time.

Download MindLift mental wellness app on the Apple App StoreGet MindLift mental wellness app on Google Play Store

Free to start · premium optional

MT

MindLift Team

CBT & Self-Talk Researchers

CBT-Informed ContentSelf-Talk ResearchEvidence-Based Techniques

MindLift content is grounded in cognitive behavioral therapy principles and designed to help you shift harsh self-talk in real time. Our guides focus on practical, evidence-based techniques you can use in the moment.

Sources (5)
Sources
  1. Friedman, M., & Rosenman, R. H. (1959). Association of specific overt behavior pattern with blood and cardiovascular findings. Journal of the American Medical Association, 169(12), 1286–1296. — DOI (opens in a new tab)
  2. Myrtek, M. (2001). Meta-analyses of prospective studies on coronary heart disease, type A personality, and hostility. International Journal of Cardiology, 79(2–3), 245–251. — DOI (opens in a new tab)
  3. Petticrew, M. P., Lee, K., & McKee, M. (2012). Type A behavior pattern and coronary heart disease: Philip Morris’s “crown jewel”. American Journal of Public Health, 102(11), 2018–2025. — DOI (opens in a new tab)
  4. Curran, T., & Hill, A. P. (2019). Perfectionism is increasing over time: A meta-analysis of birth cohort differences from 1989 to 2016. Psychological Bulletin, 145(4), 410–429. — DOI (opens in a new tab)
  5. Hofmann, S. G., Asnaani, A., Vonk, I. J. J., Sawyer, A. T., & Fang, A. (2012). The efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy: A review of meta-analyses. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 36(5), 427–440. — DOI (opens in a new tab)
MindLift content is informed by published research in cognitive behavioral therapy and psychology. This content is educational and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.

Was this article helpful?